Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- drawingboard:components:propulsion:space [2024/06/06 12:54] – [Space Propulsion] tailkinker
+++ drawingboard:components:propulsion:space [2024/06/06 12:57] (current) – [Reactionless Drives] tailkinker
@@ Line 63: / Line 63: @@
 No types or names are provided for these drives, for the simple fact that they are completely up to setting fiat.  The closest to any functional concept we have is the idea that if gravity could be manipulated, it could be used to cause a ship to "fall" in the desired direction.
-The best that can be assumed is that these drives will suck a //lot// of power from the ship's powerplant.  The exception is the TR0 reactionless drive, which is assumed to use some even more exotic principal to produce thrust, like magic.
+The best that can be assumed is that these drives will suck a //lot// of power from the ship's powerplant.  The exception is the TR? reactionless drive, which is assumed to use some even more exotic principal to produce thrust, like magic.
 ^  TR  ^  Mass (kg)         ^  Cost (\[ce])    ^  Power (kW)       ^
-|   0  |  Thrust \[di] 250     |  Mass \[mu] 250  |  --                |
+|   ?  |  Thrust \[di] 250     |  Mass \[mu] 250  |  --                |
 |  +1  |  Thrust \[di] 10      |  Mass \[mu] 12   |  Thrust \[mu] 2    |
 |  +2  |  Thrust \[di] 20      |  Mass \[mu] 9    |  Thrust \[mu] 2    |